A split-screen illustration of the US Supreme Court building: on the left, the traditional nine-seat bench, and on the right, an expanded bench with additional seats. Above, a scale balances "TRADITION" and "REFORM" with the Constitution as its fulcrum

Breaking the Nine: A Balanced Look at Supreme Court Reform

The debate over expanding the US Supreme Court has gained momentum in recent years. This comprehensive analysis delves into the historical flexibility of the Court's size, potential benefits like increased diversity and efficiency, and the challenges of maintaining legitimacy and managing long-term consequences. By examining both sides of the argument and proposing responsible implementation strategies, we aim to contribute to a thoughtful national conversation about the future of this crucial institution.
The Supreme Court’s Decision on Presidential Immunity: A Threat to the Rule of Law and Democracy

The Supreme Court’s Decision on Presidential Immunity: A Threat to the Rule of Law and Democracy

The recent Supreme Court decision granting Presidents immunity from prosecution for official acts, and barring the use of these acts as evidence of motive, represents a fundamental shift in American jurisprudence. This ruling erodes accountability, disrupts the balance of power, and threatens the core democratic principles of transparency and equitable application of the law.